Wednesday, September 30, 2009

FEHBP Premium Increase Huge Burden for Federal Annuitants

National Active and Retired Federal Employees Association (NARFE) President Margaret L. Baptiste today expressed concern that federal annuitants and workers will be burdened by the large premium increases announced in the federal employee/retiree health insurance program. “The overall average Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHBP) premium increase of 8.8 percent for 2010 will be difficult for federal annuitants to shoulder in a year when no cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) is expected and when the federal employee pay raise is anticipated to be minimal,” Baptiste said.
Baptiste is also troubled that the share paid by employees and retirees in the program’s most popular plan (Blue Cross/Blue Shield Standard option) will jump by 12.4 percent for family plans and 15.1 percent for self-only coverage.
“A 12-percent increase in our program’s most popular plan is bad enough in a no-COLA year for retirees and when workers are expected to receive a nominal pay increase,” said Baptiste, “what’s worse is that this comes at a time when some in Congress effectively want to end the FEHBP and enroll federal workers in an exchange system.”
Last week, Sen. Charles E. Grassley, R-IA, introduced an amendment to the Senate Finance Committee’s health reform bill that would require members of Congress and federal workers to leave the FEHBP and join health exchanges. NARFE opposes this amendment.

FEHBP Premiums Could Have Been Lower

“We recognize that the 2010 rate hike was within the range of increases in other large group health insurance programs and that the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is serious about reducing prescription drug costs. However, FEHBP premiums could have been lowered if it were not for OPM’s decision to reaffirm the previous administration’s policy of declining a payment available to other public and private employers who provide drug coverage as generous as Medicare’s,” Baptiste said. “Once again, this year, OPM and the Office of Management and Budget left $1 billion on the table -- a subsidy available to and accessed by private employers in the marketplace, which could be used to lower worker and annuitant premium costs,” she said.
The 2003 Medicare reform law provides such employers a payment as an incentive to retain their retiree drug coverage. A 2007 Government Accountability Office report found that premium growth in one of the largest FEHBP plans with many older enrollees could have been 3.5 to 4 percent lower in 2006 had the payment been accessed. And, it could have reduced overall FEHBP premiums for the year by more than 2 percent.

Medicare Part B Relief for Federal Annuitants

“While the FEHBP rate increase is bad news, we can take some comfort in the House’s approval on September 24 of NARFE-backed legislation (H.R. 3631) which would protect all federal annuitants – including retirees and survivors who are not eligible to receive Social Security – from the 2010 Medicare Part B premium increase,” Baptiste said. “NARFE worked tirelessly behind the scenes on this legislation for the past three months.”


HARRY GIVING US THE FINGER AGAIN

Congress is on the verge of giving itself a bump in its annual budget — even as local governments, families and businesses across the country are tightening their belts in the worst recession in decades.
-

Under a House-Senate conference measure, approved by the House last week and poised for passage in the Senate on Wednesday, spending for the legislative branch will increase 5.8 percent this year, boosting Capitol Hill’s annual budget to $4.7 billion.
-

The measure includes a hodgepodge of new funding for lawmakers: a $500,000 pilot program for senators to send out postcards about their town hall meetings, $30,000 for receptions for foreign dignitaries and $4 million for consultants — with Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) and Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) getting up to nine each and Senate President Pro Tempore Robert Byrd (D-W.Va.) getting up to three more.
-

There’s $15.8 million for salaries for the Senate Appropriations Committee — plus an extra $950,000 for the committee’s administrative expenses.
-

Funding for House office buildings will jump a staggering 128 percent, to $84 million. Some of that money will go to replace a roof at the Rayburn House Office Building, and an additional $50 million is being allocated to renovate the Cannon House Office Building.
-

The Architect of the Capitol will see a 17.8 percent hike to deal with infrastructure repairs, and the Government Printing Office’s revolving fund will increase a whopping 155 percent, to $12.7 million, to deal with technology upgrades and repairs, according to the conference report.
-

The bill — which President Barack Obama could sign as soon as Wednesday — funds operations and staff salaries in the personal offices of the 535 members of Congress, dozens of legislative committees in the House and Senate, the GPO, the Office of the Architect of the Capitol, the Government Accountability Office and the Capitol Police.
-

Supporters of the bill argue that they were relatively frugal this year. Last year, Congress increased its funding 10.9 percent over the fiscal 2008 level — and the $4.7 it’s appropriating to itself this year is less than the $5 billion Obama set forth in his budget earlier this year.
-

“This is a fiscally responsible bill,” said Jake Thompson, spokesman for Sen. Ben Nelson (D-Neb.), chairman of the Senate’s legislative branch appropriations subcommittee.
But not everyone agrees.
-

“With an enormous deficit and rest of the country tightening their belts, Congress should be looking at doing the same,” said Steve Ellis, vice president of the Taxpayers for Common Sense.
Added Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.): “The growth of expenditures particularly in these times is terrible.”
-

The Appropriations Committee disputes that funding increased by 5.8 percent, arguing that the real number is 3.5 percent — or $157 million — because of emergency spending and the $787 billion economic stimulus that added to Congress’s budget. But critics call the move a budget gimmick that does not represent a true apples-to-apples comparison of the amount of money Congress approved in last year’s spending bills versus the fiscal 2010 bills.
-

The bill contains just one earmark — a $200,000 Nelson project for a museum in Omaha, Neb. — and it includes language added by Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) to force the Senate for the first time to put its expenses online.
-

“We have not seen a significant increase in overall legislative branch expenditures since nearly 2001,” said Jonathan Beeton, a spokesman for Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.), Nelson’s counterpart in the House. “During this time, significant cost increases have occurred, and the Capitol complex has also seen significant deferred maintenance. Many of these maintenance expenses become much more expensive if they continue to be deferred.”
-

Nelson’s office said the $500,000 “pilot program” for office mailings was included at the request of Sen. Arlen Specter (D-Pa.) and has been in place since 2004. It said the additional $950,000 for the Appropriations Committee accounts for telecommunications, hearing transcripts, and travel and office supplies and that the total for the GPO is far less than the $32.1 million the agency wanted.
-

It also said that the 5.5 percent increase that will go in part to increasing aides’ salaries was derived from cost-of-living-adjustment projections.
“While the crisis is easing, we are still a nation in financial peril, and we believe it is necessary for the legislative branch to lead by example,” Nelson said last week. He said that, “with one notable but important exception” — a reference to the renovation of the Cannon building — “I think we have been successful.”
-

Still, at a time when inflation remains low and the national debt is rising fast, leadership offices across the Capitol are expecting a bump in funding. Vice President Joe Biden, who also serves as president of the Senate, will see his budget increase 4.3 percent, to $2.5 million, under the measure. The offices of Reid and McConnell will each get a 4.3 percent increase from last year and will now each have $5.2 million; House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) is seeing her budget jump 4.1 percent, to $5.1 million; the budget of House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) will rise 3.9 percent, to $2.5 million; the budget of House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) will increase 4 percent, to $4.5 million; and House Minority Whip Eric Cantor (R-Va.) and House Majority Whip Jim Clyburn (D-S.C.) each get a 3.7 percent increase, to $1.7 million and $2.2 million, respectively.
-

Jim Manley, a spokesman for Reid, said the 4.3 percent increase for Reid and McConnell is calculated by the Senate financial office to maintain current staffing levels.
“It is a cap, which neither office will necessarily meet but cannot exceed,” Manley said. He added that the authorization of up to nine consultants “is a long-standing authority to ensure the leaders’ offices can fulfill their duties to the Senate and to their respective caucuses.” Aides stressed that the money will not go to political consultants but to staffers who work on a contractual basis rather than as Senate employees.
-

The biggest hikes for the leadership offices went to the Senate whips — with Arizona Republican Jon Kyl and Illinois Democrat Dick Durbin each getting a 6.2 percent hike and each getting a new budget of $3.3 million. A spokesman for Durbin said that the hike accounts for annual cost-of-living increases, as well as the addition of new staff to oversee a more expanded Senate Democratic majority of 60 members. Even though Republicans have just 40 members, Kyl’s budget is the same as Durbin’s, but a Kyl spokesman said his office “always returns a large amount of funding” at the end of the fiscal year.
-

The bill is now headed to the Senate floor — and senators will be hard-pressed to block it. With the fiscal year ending Wednesday, Congress needs to pass a short-term, stopgap resolution to keep the government funded through October — and that resolution is included in the legislative appropriations bill, meaning a defeat for the bill could shut the government down.
House Republicans protested the move, with 162 Republicans — including the subcommittee’s ranking member, Alabama Rep. Robert Aderholt — last week voting against the bill last week, which was sent to the Senate on a 217-190 vote.
-

But the increase in funding has otherwise largely been a bipartisan affair. The Senate Appropriations Committee — where McConnell and 29 other appropriators sit — voted 30-0 in June to send the bill to the full Senate, which approved the bill in July by a 67-25 vote.

HARRY REID SAYS SCREW YOU AMERICA I'M GETTING RE-ELECTED

HARRY REID IS THE POST CHILD FOR WHAT A POLITICIAN IS ALL ABOUT.

Reid has just demonstrated that what ever it takes to get re-elected is fair even if it means that people in other states have to suffer for it. Reid has demonstrated that it's not about what is good for the country, but what is good for him politically.
_
The Baucus Bill health care plan now includes an amendment at Reid's request that will exempt Nevada for 5 years from having to increase taxes to cover the cuts to medicaid that the Baucus Bill includes. Three other states had similar amendments made to the Baucus bill. The results of these amendments will mean greater cuts to the other 46 states which will mean high taxes in those states to maintain their current medicaid programs, this will raises taxes an additional 4% to cover the four states that are exempt.
_
If the 2010 elections were held today, Reid would not return to office. He needs to boost his polls number. Being the scum politician he is, he's turning on the rest of the country causing increase in their taxes so that he can get his poll numbers up. Reid cares less about the country. It's more important for him to get elected no matter who he hurts in other states. If you are resident of Nevada you need to turn this self centered politician out of office. Don't suffer the embarrassment of voting him back into office. If Reid gives the finger to the rest of America what makes you think he won't turn on Nevada voters.

Tuesday, September 29, 2009

INDEPENDENT VOTERS CHANGE YOUR VOTING MIND SET

Our political world consists of Dems and Reps. Dems always vote for Dems and Reps always vote for Reps. It's the Independent voters that swing an election. It was the Independents that swung the last two presidential elections. That is all good and fine, but the independents are missing something greater than just swinging a vote. I suggest that independent voters vote for an independent. If the independent voters could elect 5 US senators just think how much power those 5 senators would have. Just think of 5 individuals not tied either party who looked at proposed legislation from a practical view point, what would proposed bills look like. Maybe they would be void of the pork that turns many us into prostitutes, that's what you call someone when they give favors for money or pork is it not. Just think of health care now loaded with over 500 amendments to the Baucus bill. How many of those amendments would have to be dropped if 5 independent senators refused to vote on the bill. Wouldn't it be wonderful to see new legislation being passed that didn't promote a politician's career but instead promoted what was good for the country.
-
How many of you hardcore Dems and Reps would switch their vote to someone that wants nothing more than what is good for the country? Can you bring yourself to the point that maybe being a diehard party voter is not the best thing to be for the good of the country? Can you open your mind enough to see that maybe something better may be out there than just towing the party line? Remember one fact, our politicians are arrogant and we made them that way. Voting for the same politician time after time only breeds arrogance into them for they know that their diehard followers will never vote for anyone from the other party. That would mean being a traitor to the party, forget about the damage being done to the country. The party comes first and screw the country if that what it takes.
-
Hit your keyboards, but before you fly off the handle think about loyalty to party and loyalty to the country, be an independent thinker. Being a hardcore party follower is the same as belonging to a religious cult is it not?

Friday, September 25, 2009

THE GOVERNMENT ACORN

There is a point that you should understand about congress and the bills they write. No matter how unimportant a bill may seem, how little it may affect you if at all, once passed into law a bill becomes living document. Like ACORN it can grow in different ways. Changes to it can be made and these changes can be hidden in other major bills. We know that major bills are not read by those that pass them as evident by no one reading the Cap & Trade bill that pasted in Congress and heaven help us if that bill passes the senate. What started as a minor bill can grow to something that can affect us all in the pocket book. It can grow in hideous ways similar to how ACORN grew into an evil organization. If you ignore what congress does then one day you may find you have a federal ACORN you will have to live with.

CHANGE IT OR LIVE WITH IT

A poll out this past week showed that 80% of us do not like what congress is doing and the direction it is taking us. If after the 2010 elections 80% us still do not approve of congress and the direction it is taking us, then who is to blame?

Thursday, September 24, 2009

HUMANA LETTER


For those that wish to read the Humana letter that currently has congresss going off the deep end, here's a URL you can get it from. http://big.assets.huffingtonpost.com/humanamailer.pdf